Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Citibank (South Dakota) NA
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided December 16, 2016No. 7141 S-14740/S-14826PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STOWERS, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Two credit card holders defaulted on their accounts, and the issuing bank1 elected to litigate debt-collection actions. After courts entered default judgments against both card holders, the card holders filed new and separate suits alleging that the bank violated the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act (UTPA) during the earlier debt collection actions. The bank moved in each case to arbitrate the UTPA claims, and the superior court stayed the UTPA litigation and ordered arbitration. We must decide whether the bank waived its right to…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cain v. Midland Funding, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Security Alarm Financing Enterprises, L.P. v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Edna L. v. State of Alaska, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services, John L. v. State of Alaska, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
- Bauer-Robertson v. Shiva Finance, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2021
- Cain v. Midland Funding, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.