Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hurd v. Blomstrom

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1949No. File No. 9018PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSicke'L, J.

This is a mandamus proceeding. Relator is a resident, elector and taxpayer of the City of Winner. Defendants are the Mayor and Board of Aldermen of the City of Winner. On March 15th, 1948, there was filed in .the office of the city auditor a petition for the enactment and submission to the voters of a proposed ordinance granting to the Rosebud Electric Association, a corporation, the right to continue to occupy the streets, alleys and public places in the city for the operation of a public utility for the production, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity. The petition was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. AmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Hodges v. SnyderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Jensen v. JuulSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Travelers Insurance v. Village of WadsworthOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Smith v. CleaverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Owens v. City of BeresfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Bucholz v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Jerauld County v. Saint Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  4. US Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  5. Oesterling v. OesterlingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API