Legal Opinion

Oesterling v. Oesterling

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1984No. 14200PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment in a contempt action which granted appellant only $4,000 of the $21,400 alimony arrear-age. Appellant M. Irene Oesterling (wife) claimed that Richard W. Oesterling (husband) owed her $21,400 accumulated alimony for a period of nearly nine years. The trial court allowed her only $4,000 for accrued alimony to date of judgment. Wife appeals and we reverse and remand.

Wife received a divorce from her husband on May 3, 1974. Under a stipulation agreement signed May 1, 1974 and approved in the divorce decree of May 3rd, wife was to receive $50 per week…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Daugaard v. Baltic Cooperative Building Supply Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. American Property Services, Inc. v. BarringerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. McMacken v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Stark v. StarkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Smith v. CleaverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. High Plains Genetics Research, Inc. v. J K Mill-Iron RanchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Kier v. KierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Huth v. HoffmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Ferebee v. HobartSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. All Star Const. Co., Inc. v. KoehnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API