Legal Opinion

Dunipace v. Martin

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1952No. 5369PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DE CONCINI, Justice.

This appeal presents but one question for our determination, i. e., the propriety of asking prospective jurors questions phrased to determine whether they are in any way connected with an insurance company. Usually, such a question would only be propounded by plaintiff’s counsel in the type of action where an insurance company might stand behind any liability for which the defendant would (be found responsible.

Plaintiff, William S. Dunipace (appellant) as administrator of the estate of Theresa Mendibles, filed a civil action against Jerome P. Martin, then sheriff of Pima…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Butane Corporation v. KirbyArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Blue Bar Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. HudspethArizona Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Consolidated Motors, Inc. v. KetchamArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Tom Reed Gold Mines Co. v. MorrisonArizona Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. BerryArizona Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. E. L. Jones Construction Co. v. NolandArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Reich v. Cominco Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Evans v. MasonArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  4. State v. LambArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. JuengelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API