Legal Opinion
Weltz v. Lee
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 7, 2001No. Nos. 00 Civ. 3863(DAB), 00 Civ. 4021(DAB), 00 Civ. 4117(DAB), 00 Civ. 4557(DAB), 00 Civ. 5224(DAB)PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*130 MEMORANDUM & ORDER
BATTS, District Judge.
Pending before this Court are five securities fraud class actions against GTE Corporation (hereafter “GTE”) and certain of its officers and directors. Each action alleges that Defendants made materially false and misleading statements in a proxy statement in violation of section 14(a) and section 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). The five actions are as follows:
Weltz, et al. v. GTE Corp., et al., 00 CIV 3863 (the “Weltz Action”);
Sugarman v. GTE Corp., et al., 00 CIV 4021 (the “Sugarman Action”);
D’elia v. GTE Corp., et al.,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- John E. Johnson and H/w Ann Marie Johnson v. The Celotex Corporation, Owens-Illinois, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- In Re Olsten Corp. Securities Litig.District Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- In re Oxford Health Plans Inc., Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- In re Donnkenny Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- In re eSpeed, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. v. LaBranche & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Khunt v. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Constance Sczesny Trust v. KPMG LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- In Re Razorfish, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.