Legal Opinion
Gibson-Stewart Company, Inc. v. Wm. Bros Boiler and Manufacturing Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 19, 1959No. 13500PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Circuit Judge.
In this suit for patent infringement, the able and experienced district judge held the four claims of Bros, et al., Patent (No. 2,610,557) to be valid and infringed by the appellant, Gibson-Stewart Company, Inc.
As stated by the patentee, the invention in the patent in suit relates to the art of compacting earth for roads, highways, airport runways, fills for dams, etc., where deep penetration and uniform but maximum density are important objectives and where the primary purpose is to provide a novel, efficient and practical pneumatic-tired compactor that will…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Williams Manufacturing Co. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Williams Mfg. Co. v. United Shoe MacH. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Modern Products Supply Co. v. DrachenbergCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Aluminum Co. of America v. Sperry Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- Harvey v. LevineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- Axel Harald Holstensson v. V-M CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- Bros Inc. v. W. E. Grace Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Wm. Bros Boiler and Manufacturing Co. (By Change of Name Now Bros, Incorporated) v. Gibson-Stewart Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.