Legal Opinion
DeRito v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 4, 1989No. 7008PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The plaintiffs in this action are the town of Middlebury and Paul A. DeRito, the duly authorized building official and zoning enforcement officer for Mid-dlebury. The defendants Paul A. Lux and Patricia Tillyer sought and secured a variance from the defend*100ant Middlebury Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) to create a new nonconforming building lot from their two existing separate nonconforming lots. The plaintiff DeRito had determined that the defendant property owners’ plans did not conform to the Middlebury zoning regulations and, together with the town, appealed the defendant ZBA’s granting of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Simko v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Cahill v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Schwartz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Concerned Citizens of Sterling v. Town of SterlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Tyler v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Avalonbay Communities, Inc. v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Avalonbay Communities, Inc. v. Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Town of Wallingford v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- 137 East Aurora v. Zoning Commission, No. Cv98-0146592s (Dec. 11, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
- Avalonbay Communities, Inc. v. Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.