Legal Opinion

Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Bouterie

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 7, 1936No. 1634PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OTT, Judge.

On March 16, 1932, Anthony Fiorenza and the two defendants in this suit, A. S. Bouterie and O. P. Hymel, signed a note as comakers payable to the order of the Continental Credit Corporation for the sum of $195.74, with 3½ per cent, interest per month, payable in 19 monthly installments, beginning one month after date. The note bound the makers, signers, in-dorsers, guarantors, sureties, and each in solido for the payment of the said note. The note contained the following additional provisions on its face: “Failure to pay any installment of this note, or to fulfill any of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bonart v. RabitoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  2. Central Finance Co. v. MartinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Morris Plan Bank v. GlocknerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Meadow Brook National Bank v. RecileDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
  2. Polk Chevrolet, Inc. v. VicaroLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Spragins v. McCalebSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. SummonsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. United Loan Corp. v. KyerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API