Legal Opinion
Bonart v. Rabito
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided June 11, 1917No. 22381PublishedCited by 36 opinions
Suit by Samuel Bonart against Mrs. A. P. Rabito. Judgment for plaintiff, and from a judgment of the Court of Appeal reversing the judgment of the district court, plaintiff applies for certiorari or writ of review.
1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, J.
This suit was brought by the payee against the indorser of a promissory note signed by one W. A. Leininger. Here is a copy of the note, annexed to the plaintiff’s petition, viz.:
“$350.00. Due Jan. 1/14.
“New Orleans, July 1st, 1913.
“Six months after date, for value received, we the signors, indorsers, guarantors, and sureties, and each of us in solido, promise to pay to the order of Sam Bonart the sum of three hundred and fifty dollars, at the Commercial-Germania Trust & Savings Bank, New Orleans, with interest at the rate of 8 per cent, from maturity until paid.
“The makers, indorsers,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Rey v. SimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Ackley School District v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Atkins v. Dixie Fair Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
- Hibernia Bank & Trust Co. v. DresserSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Meadow Brook National Bank v. RecileDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
- Louisiana Bank and Trust Co., Crowley v. BoutteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- Central Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Oilfield Supply & Scrap Material Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
- State Nat. Bank of Ft. Worth v. VickeryTexas Commission of Appeals · 1918
- Farmers' & Merchants' Bank v. DaviesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.