Weatherly v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.
Under facts, as disclosed by the evidence adduced upon the trial of this case in the court below, the first count was improper and should have been incorporated in the indictment. The trial court so held, and gave the affirmative charge as to said count.
The foregoing action of the court left one count remaining in the indictment. Count 2 as therein designated. The trial was had upon said count, which reads as follows: “The grand jury of said county further charge that, before the finding of this indictment, E. N. Byrd and Hugh Weatherly, whose names are to the grand…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gilmore v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Robison v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
- Gravlee v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
- Robison v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Collins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Lunceford v. City of NorthportCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
- Hayes v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
- Peek v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957