Legal Opinion

Hayes v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1947No. 4 Div. 997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

The affidavit upon which the prosecution in this case is based is an anomaly, in that it states,

“Before me C. J. Nordan a J. P. in and for said Henry County, personally came J. L. Corbitt, who being duly sworn, deposes and says that he has probable cause for believing, and does believe that the offense of unlawfully poisoning the Mount creek for the purpose of catching fish, has been committed in Henry County, Alabama, by Earl Hayes in that the said Earl Hayes within twelve months before making this affidavit, unlawfully poisoned the Mount creek for the purpose of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gilmore v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
  3. Tatum v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  4. Echols v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Sexton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smitherman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Lunceford v. City of NorthportCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  4. Brown v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API