Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. Geithner
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 13, 2010No. Civil Action 05-1549 (RBW)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
Gary Hamilton, the plaintiff in this civil suit, seeks compensatory damages as a result of employment practices that he alleges are in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2000e-17 (2006), and that the agency failed to make competitive a detail that was assigned to Annette Burrell, in violation of the Whistleblower Protection Act, 5 U.S.C. § 2302. Amended Complaint (the “Compl.”) at 5. Currently before the Court is a motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment filed by the defendant,…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Gary Hamilton v. Timothy GeithnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Turner v. NicholsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Barouch v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Abou-Hussein v. MabusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Proctor v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.