Legal Opinion

Steele v. Water Resources Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 15, 2012No. HE559; A144766PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

• Petitioner John Steele seeks judicial review of a final order in which the Water Resources Department determined, in accordance with ORS 543.255, that a proposed hydroelectric project at the Dorena Dam on the Row River in Lane County does not have impacts that are cumulative with those of other existing or proposed hydroelectric projects in the same river basin. Based on that determination, the department in its order concluded that it was not necessary to hold a consolidated contested case hearing to review those cumulative impacts. Because petitioner has neither challenged the decision…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shank v. Board of NursingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Metco Manufacturing, Inc. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Association of Oregon Corrections Employees v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. Vaughn v. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. 3P Delivery, Inc. v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Engweiler v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. Innovative Design & Construction, LLC v. Construction Contractors BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API