Steele v. Water Resources Commission
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.
• Petitioner John Steele seeks judicial review of a final order in which the Water Resources Department determined, in accordance with ORS 543.255, that a proposed hydroelectric project at the Dorena Dam on the Row River in Lane County does not have impacts that are cumulative with those of other existing or proposed hydroelectric projects in the same river basin. Based on that determination, the department in its order concluded that it was not necessary to hold a consolidated contested case hearing to review those cumulative impacts. Because petitioner has neither challenged the decision…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shank v. Board of NursingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Metco Manufacturing, Inc. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
3Cited by7 opinions
- Association of Oregon Corrections Employees v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Vaughn v. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- 3P Delivery, Inc. v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Engweiler v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- Innovative Design & Construction, LLC v. Construction Contractors BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.