Legal Opinion
State v. Grant
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 28, 2007No. AC 26871PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The defendant, Peter Grant, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-56 (a) (l). On appeal, the defendant claims that the jury’s verdict of guilty on the charge of manslaughter in the second degree was legally and logically inconsistent with its verdict of not guilty on the charge of carrying a dangerous weapon in violation of General Statutes § 53-206. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. In the middle of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- State v. HintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. DecaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. LegnaniConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. MoranConnecticut Appellate Court · 2026