Legal Opinion

McKnight v. Lowitz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1917No. Docket No. 34PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Cass; Des Voignes, J. Assumpsit by William F. McKnight against Elick Lowitz for professional services. Judgment for plaintiff, and both parties bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This is an action in assumpsit brought to recover for professional services as an attorney at law, *369alleged to have been rendered by the plaintiff and his late copartner to the defendant in two transactions. The declaration proceeds against the defendant only. It consists of a special count and also the common counts in assumpsit, and alleges the assignment of the claim to the plaintiff by his former partner. The bill of particulars of the plaintiff’s demand, which was filed, is as follows:

1908

Sept. 3. To fees for time spent in consultation •with self as to organization of Cass County State…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Clark v. O'RourkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Mitchell v. ChambersMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Munn v. HaynesMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  4. People v. DennisMichigan Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Porter v. LeacheMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fisher Sand & Gravel Co. v. Neal a Sweebe, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Fisher Sand & Gravel Co. v. Neal a Sweebe, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API