Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Fisher Sand & Gravel Co. v. Neal a Sweebe, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 2013No. Docket 143374Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMarkman, J.

At issue is whether either an “account stated” or an “amount owed on open account” claim is subject to the four-year limitations period of § 2-725 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), MCL 440.2725, which applies to actions for breach of the legal obligations that result from the sale of goods.1 I agree with the majority that the UCC’s four-year limitations period does not apply to an “account stated” claim because an “account stated” claim does not constitute an action for breach of the legal obligations that result from the sale of goods. Such a claim is not based upon the buyer’s failure…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Neibarger v. Universal Coopertives, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. White v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Wilson v. Browning Arms CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Sesow v. SwearingenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  5. A. Krolik & Co. v. OssowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API