Legal Opinion

Nagle v. Club Fontainbleu

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1965No. 10198PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Gary M. Nagle, a building contractor, sued defendant Club Fontainbleu, a recre ational club located at 1651 Vine Street in Murray, for payment for construction on the club properties; to recover on a promissory note for $11,000.00 the club had given him for part of the work; to enforce an agreement for forfeiture of the club property upon default in payment of the note; and/or to foreclose a lien for labor and materials in the total amount of $25,291.27 against the club property for all of the construction done by Nagle thereon.

Upon a trial to the court, it found that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Charlton v. HackettUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Perkins v. SpencerUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  4. McMurray v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
  5. Watkins v. SimondsUtah Supreme Court · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Palombi v. D & C BUILDERSUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Rush v. AnestosIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Concannon v. YewellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  4. Johnston v. AustinUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Owyhee, Inc. v. Robbins Marco PoloUtah Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API