Legal Opinion

Stickney v. Interstate Commerce Commission

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota

Decided June 30, 1908PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. On motion for preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, Circuit Judge.

This is a bill in equity, brought by the railroad companies, which are complainants, against the Interstate Commerce Commission, to enjoin the enforcement of an order made by the latter requiring them to desist from charging $2 per car for transporting live stock brought from outside the state of Illinois, from the ends of their roads in Chicago to the Union Stockyards, and not to exact for that service hereafter a greater sum than $1 per car. The present submission is on a motion for a temporary injunction based on the bill, answer filed thereto, and exhibits filed with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. TowsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Moore v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. GillSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. James v. Germania Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  5. Inter. Com. Commis'n v. CHICAGO & C. R'D CO.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Los Angeles & Salt Lake RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Atlantic Coast Line R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. F. H. Peavey & Co. v. Union Pac. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1910
  4. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1908
  5. Diamond Tank Transport, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API