Legal Opinion
Diamond Tank Transport, Inc. v. United States
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided May 18, 1938No. 1205PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANEY, Circuit Judge.
An injunction against the use of rates published in a tariff filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission, and an adjudication that an order of the Commission is void, are sought by the bill presented to •us.
The five petitioners are Washington corporations engaged in the business of transporting petroleum products in bulk, in intrastate and interstate commerce. The respondents named are the United States, the Commission and' the North Pacific Coast Freight Bureau, hereinafter designated as the Bureau. The Bureau is an association of railroads, operating in intrastate and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- The Chicago Junction CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- United States v. Los Angeles & Salt Lake RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Manufacturers Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States v. GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Texas-Empire Pipe Line Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Farley Terminal Company, Inc. v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, Harold Willinger, Doing Business as Assembly Consolidators, Plaintiff v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Farley Terminal Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Texas-Empire Pipe Line Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942