Legal Opinion

Frankenthal v. Goldstein

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from ihe Madison Circuit Court. — Hon. Jas. H. Pox, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

Several creditors of the firm of Goldstein & Rosenwater sued out an attachment against that firm and levied upon their stock of goods. Two third parties, Jacob E. Roth and Samuel White, inter-pleaded for the property. Roth was a merchant and a creditor of defendants, and White had been one of their employes, and was also a creditor. In satisfaction, or pretended satisfaction, of the claims of these two creditors, and for a further consideration paid by them, the defendants conveyed to them all their property in two stores which they were carrying on. The stock in their store at Charleston…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Shelley v. BootheSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  2. Potter v. McDowellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
  3. Wannell v. KemSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  4. Holland v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
  5. Gay v. GillilantSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mathews v. LothMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Carder v. PrimmMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Crawford v. GreenleafMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API