Legal Opinion

Mathews v. Loth

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Daniel Dillon, Judge. •

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

— This case is said to be one of a series of thirty-two suits by attachment, instituted on November 20, 1889, and the days following, by creditors of the firm of A. Loth & Sons, which firm was composed of Adolph, Albert and Bernard M. Loth. The grounds on which the present attachment was sued out are that the defendants have fraudulently conveyed or assigned their property or effects so as to hinder or delay their creditors ; that the defendants have fraudulently concealed, removed or disposed of their property or effects, so as to hinder or delay their creditors; that defendants are about…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Frankenthal v. GoldsteinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rogers v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. Simon v. NortonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Dodson-Hills Manufacturing Co. v. PaytonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API