Legal Opinion

Carder v. Primm

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Clark Circuit Court. — Hon. Ben E. Turner, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.

This is the fourth appeal in this ease.' Our opinions on former appeals are reported in 47 Mo. App. 301, 52 Mo. App. 102, and 60 Mo. App. 423. As it is in the interest of both litigants and courts that the trial of the same cause should not go on forever, we would not be warranted in disturbing the judgment herein, unless we are fully satisfied that error has intervened in the last trial which was unquestionably prejudicial to the party appealing. Such is also the view entertained by the supreme court in Spohn v. Railroad, 87 Mo. 74, 101 Mo. 417, 116 Mo. 617, 122 Mo. 1.

The facts of the case…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Spohn v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  2. Boatmen's Savings Bank v. OverallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Marshall v. Thames Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  4. Spohn v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  5. Gibson v. ZeibigMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Walsh v. Southtown Motors CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API