Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Cothern

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 19, 1957No. 9580Published

1ConcurrenceLatimeR, Judge

(concurring in the result) :

I concur in the result.

I am becoming convinced that Moris-sette v United States, 842 US 246, 72 S Ct 240, 96 L ed 288, is a legal phenomenon in military law, for it is being cited in support of so many legal principles that it must blanket the entire criminal field. I just fail to see its applicability to the issues of this case, for the issue there involved a charge of larceny and a defense of mistake of fact. The Supreme Court held that the trial judge in his instructions could not take away from the jury its duty to find on the elements of a larcenous intent. No…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States v. McCraryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1951
  3. United States v. RowanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  4. United States v. NoeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  5. United States v. FerrettiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API