Legal Opinion
Pillette v. Berghuis
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided October 2, 2009No. Civil 2:06-14511PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR IMMEDIATE CONSIDERATION AND FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL
ARTHUR J. TARNOW, District Judge.
On June 19, 2009, this Court granted a writ of habeas corpus to petitioner, on the ground that petitioner had been denied the effective assistance of trial counsel. Pillette v. Berghuis, 630 F.Supp.2d 791 (E.D.Mich.2009). This Court granted the writ, conditioned upon the State of Michigan taking action to afford petitioner a new trial within ninety days of the order. On July 22, 2009, the Court denied respondent’s motion for a stay pending appeal. On September…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wilkinson v. DotsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Wynn Satterlee v. Hugh WolfenbargerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Howard P. Fisher v. Jim Rose and William LeechCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Ward v. WolfenbargerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- Pillette v. BerghuisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- D'AMBROSIO v. BagleyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010