Legal Opinion
D'AMBROSIO v. Bagley
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 3, 2010No. Case 1:00-CV-2521PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KATHLEEN McDONALD O’MALLEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is Petitioner Joe D’Ambrosio’s Motion for Relief from Judgment (Doc. 251), filed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). In this motion, D’Ambrosio asks this Court to vacate its April 27, 2009 Order (Doc. 243). Ultimately, it is D’Ambrosio’s hope that the Court will enter a new, broader, order barring his reprosecution in this capital case. The Respondent, Margaret Bagley, and the Intervenor, the Cuyahoga County Prosecutor’s Office (collectively, the “State”) filed a joint brief in opposition to D’Ambrosio’s…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Joe D'Ambrosio v. Carmen MarinoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- D'AMBROSIO v. BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Durham v. MartinDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019
- State ex rel. O'Malley v. Russo (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
- D'Ambrosio v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.