Jeffrey Phillip Kamrin v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
Kamrin seeks a writ of habeas corpus to prevent his extradition to Australia on the ground that the United States statute of limitation would bar the underlying prosecution on charges arising from acts in Australia ending in 1974. Because nothing in the extradition treaty between the two countries provides for application of the United States statute of limitation in this case or for full United States due process rights, we affirm the denial of the writ. FACTS
Kamrin is a citizen and, since 1975, a resident of the United States. In December 1980, he was charged…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Neely v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Nathaniel Holmes v. Melvin Laird, as Secretary of the United States Department of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Gerald Joseph Caplan v. Thomas R. Vokes, 1 in His Capacity as United States Marshal, and Alexander M. Haig, United States Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Jaime J. Merino v. United States MarshalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Scott WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- William Joseph Quinn v. Glen Robinson, United States Marshal for the Northern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Thomas James Martin v. Warden, Atlanta Pen, U.S. Marshall ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- John Evangelist (Thomas) Murphy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Miguel Salerno v. United States of America, United States Attorney General, and United States Marshal for the Eastern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Lopez-Smith v. HoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.