Legal Opinion
Marshall Field & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 27, 1943No. 8154PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner challenges the correctness of the Board’s determination of units appropriate for collective bargaining, in its Chicago retail department store.
It1 contends: (1) the entire store should be designated as the appropriate unit, (2) the “gerrymander” method of grouping heterogeneous groups in the respectively designated units is at odds with the Company’s established hierarchy of management organization, (3) the Board’s designation of the appropriate units must precede election of bargaining representatives.
The instant proceeding arose through a request, in May,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. Chicago Apparatus Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Marlin-Rockwell Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
3Cited by14 opinions
- Pacific Southwest Airlines, and Pacific Southwest Airmotive v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- National Labor Relations Board v. Weyerhaeuser Company, a Corporation, as Successor to the Ace Folding Box CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, CIO v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
- National Labor Relations Board v. Local 404, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen& Helpers of America, A.F.LCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.