Legal Opinion
United States v. Grace
District Court, D. Montana
Decided August 31, 2006No. CR05-07-M-DWMPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOLLOY, Chief Judge.
I. Introduction
The Defendants have filed a motion in limine to exclude any evidence or expert testimony relating to the medical screening study conducted in Libby by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), the findings of which were published in a peer-reviewed research journal. The Defendants argue that the study is inadmissible under Fed.R.Evid. 702 because it is irrelevant and not scientifically reliable. The Defendants say the study should also be excluded because its probative value is outweighed by the risk of prejudice and jury confusion,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- City Of Los Angeles, Harbor Division, A Municipal Corporation, Petitioner-Appellant v. Santa Monica BaykeeperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Johnson v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, D. Montana · 2013
- United States v. GraceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2009
- Alexander v. MDU Resources GroupDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2020
- Alexander v. MDU Resources GroupDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2020
- Ducheneaux v. Lower Yellowstone Rural Electric Association, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 2021