Legal Opinion
Bazan v. Canales
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided August 24, 2006No. 13-04-209-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Chief Justice VALDEZ.
Appellant, Pedro Bazan, brings a restricted appeal of a dismissal for want of prosecution entered by the trial court. Tex.R.App. P. 30. By three points of error, Bazan claims that: (1) he is entitled to a complete and accurate record on appeal; (2) the trial court erred by failing to consider and rule on his Rule 306a motion and motion to reinstate, including failing to set an oral hearing and grant said motions; *846and (3) the trial court erred in dismissing the case for want of prosecution because the court had decided the merits of the case and refused to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Comet Aluminum Company v. DibrellTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Quaestor Investments, Inc. v. State of ChiapasTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. LindsayTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Ortiz v. O. J. Beck & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Williams v. WyrickTexas Supreme Court · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Texas Department of Public Safety v. Fredricks, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2007
- Texas Department of Public Safety v. Raquel Ibarra, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2014
- Bazan v. Canales, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
- Estate of Gert L. Rabke, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
- Ex Parte Erika Rivera, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.