Legal Opinion
McDonald's Corp. v. Shop at Home, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided February 2, 2000No. 3:99-0438PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TRAUGER, District Judge.
Sports Collectibles, Inc., Classic Collectibles, LLC., and Gary Fillers purchased a large number of Teenie Beanie Baby toys offered in McDonald’s 1999 marketing campaign prior to the toys’ release date. The Shop At Home television network then offered those toys for sale, giving consumers an opportunity to get the toy while bypassing the “drive through,” or avoiding buying a McDonald’s Happy Meal. McDonald’s has sought and obtained a preliminary injunction from this court and now seeks damages under state and federal laws. Sports Collectibles, Classic…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
- Messer Griesheim Industries, Inc. v. Cryotech of Kingsport, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
- Microsoft Corp. v. SellersDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2006
- Abercrombie & Fitch v. Fashion Shops of Kentucky, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
- Samuel Moore v. Weinstein Company, LLC, TheCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.