Legal Opinion
Whittington v. The Nordam Group Inc
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 29, 2005No. 04-5097, 04-5107PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
The jury awarded a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Milton Whittington, Sr., in a suit under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 623 et seq. (ADEA), against The Nordam Group, Inc. Nordam appeals the district court’s judgment on several grounds: the denial of Nor dam’s motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL), alleged errors with respect to jury instructions, and the exclusion of evidence. Mr. Whittington cross-appeals on the district court’s calculation of front-pay damages. We affirm the judgment in all respects.
I. FACTS
When reviewing a jury…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- O'CONNOR v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Terry N. Garrett v. Hewlett-Packard Company, a California Company Authorized to Do Business in the State of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Vance v. Ball State Univ.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Fassbender v. Correct Care Solutions, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Donlin v. Philips Lighting North America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Anchondo v. Anderson, Crenshaw & Associates, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Sanders v. Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.