Steigman v. OUTRIGGER ENTERPRISES, INC.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
NAKAYAMA, J.
Petitioner-Plaintiff-Appellant Michele R. Steigman brought this tort action to recover damages after suffering a slip-and-fall accident while she was a guest of Respondent-Defendant-Appellee Outrigger Enterprises’ Ohana Surf Hotel. The ease went to trial, and a jury found that Outrigger was not negligent.1 Steigman’s appeal to the Intermediate Court of Appeals (“ICA”) resulted in a Summary Disposition Order affirming the trial court’s final judgment.
Steigman’s application for writ of cer-tiorari presents a question of first impression, namely, whether…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Armstrong v. Best Buy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
- Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Ward v. K Mart Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Parker v. Highland Park, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Walter E. and Mary L. Hersh v. E-T EnterprisesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
- Walters v. WaltersSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
- Samson v. Nahulu.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2015
- Gold Coast Neighborhood Association v. State.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
- Cheryl Dorsey v. Taubman Auburn Hills AssociatesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.