Legal Opinion

Gold Coast Neighborhood Association v. State.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 2017No. SCWC-14-0000472PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

POLLACK, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

For at least the past 65 years, residents and visitors of O’ahu have been free to walk along the cement path atop a seawall (the Seawall) on or near the seaward boundaries of property between 2943 Kalákaua Avenue and 3019 Kalákaua Avenue to access the beach, shoreline, and ocean in order to swim, surf, fish, and enjoy other activities of island living. Over the course of these many decades, the State has paid for and completed repairs and maintenance on the Seawall, enabling the public to continue to safely use the footpath. As recently as…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Mobil Oil Corp. v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Isbrandtsen Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. State v. LopezHawaii Supreme Court · 1995

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clearpoint Crossing Property Owners Association and Cullen's LLC and 11500 Space Center, LLC v. Joseph Chambers and Debbie Chambers, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2018
  2. Tuttle v. Front Street Affordable Housing PartnersDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API