Legal Opinion

Fifty West Broad, Inc. v. Poulson

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1943No. 3655PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BY THE COURT:

This matter is before the Court as a result of motions filed by both appellant and appellee. We will treat both motions in this opinion.

To bring the matter to our present attention we refer to our decision of the 30th of October, 1943, where we considered the appeal from the judgment of the Municipal Court. We considered the notation made by the Municipal Judge to the effect, “Cause called. Witnesses sworn and testified. Trial had and concluded. Court finds for the defendant.” This entry was made on May 28, 1943, and on June 9th a formal final entry was filed. Notice of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Manhattan Tereazzo Brass Strip Co. v. Benzing & SonsOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Reinker v. RoeCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1941

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. England v. Trustees of Franklin Twp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. City of Dayton v. SwartzelOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. American Zinc Oxide Co. v. Local Union No. 536Ohio Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. Hebden v. HebdenOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Martin v. CoffmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API