Brown v. Brodell
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Jerry Brodell, Sr. and Jerry Bro-dell, Jr. appealed from a district court judgment holding that the doctrine of acquiescence did not apply to their land dispute with George Brown. We affirm, concluding that the decision of the district court was not clearly erroneous.
I
[¶ 2] The parties own adjoining property in Freeborn Township in Eddy County. Jerry Brodell, Sr. has owned and occupied the southwest quarter of Section 19 since 1951. George Brown has owned the southeast quarter of Section 19 since 1992. Before George Brown purchased his land, the southeast…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wetzel v. SchlenvogtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Manz v. BoharaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Production Credit Ass'n of Mandan v. Terra Vallee, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- James v. GriffinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Bernier v. PreckelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Deyle v. DeyleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Gimbel v. MagrumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Moody v. SundleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- McCarvel v. PerhusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Sauter v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.