Legal Opinion

James v. Griffin

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 2001No. 20000216PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Juanita D. James, David M. James, and Leanna Hudson (collectively referred to as “James”) appealed from a judgment quieting title in Paul and Julene Griffin to a 4-feet by 173-feet piece of residential property. We conclude the trial court correctly ruled James failed to establish ownership of the disputed parcel of property under the doctrine of acquiescence, and we affirm.

*706I

[¶2] The parties own and occupy adjoining property. James owns Lot 4, and the Griffins own Lots 5 and 6, in Block 1 of Hubbard and Tyler’s Addition to the City of Wahpeton. George James, who was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brown v. GobbleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Ward v. ShippNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Kim-Go, H.K. Minerals, Inc. v. J.P. Furlong Enterprises, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Ollinger v. BennettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  5. Grandin v. GardinerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Markgraf v. WelkerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Gimbel v. MagrumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Moody v. SundleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Brown v. BrodellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Larson v. TonnesonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API