Legal Opinion

Tompkins v. Compton

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 24, 1893PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Complaint on notes. Before Judge Westmoreland. City court of Atlanta. March term, 1898.

1Opinion of the Court

Simmons, Justice.

Tompkins ’was sued by Compton upon two promissory notes -executed by Tompkins and Woodson at Sheffield, Alabama, May 28th, 1888, one payable to Compton or order, the other payable to Graves or order and indorsed by Graves to' Compton. The defendant filed special pleas, setting up, among other grounds of defence, that the consideration of the notes sued on was illegal. A general demurrer to these pleas was sustained, and the defendant excepted. .

We think the pleas,contain a good defence, in so far as they rest upon the element of illegality. It appears from -the allegations…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Howell ex rel. Jones v. FountainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847
  2. Nathan v. TompkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  3. Heineman v. NewmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  4. Milner, Wood & Wren v. PattonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1873
  5. Ware v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sewell v. NorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Garrison v. BurnsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  3. Davis v. JanewaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. McAndrew v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  5. Baxter v. Bank of GrantvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API