State v. Walker
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Douglas Circuit Court. — No». Jno. T. , Moore, Judge. (1) The information, which was duly verified, is in proper form and contains the necessary averments.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Douglas Circuit Court. — No». Jno. T. , Moore, Judge. (1) The information, which was duly verified, is in proper form and contains the necessary averments. It states the court and the trial of the cause in which the perjury is alleged to have been committed; the nature of the action then pending; the fact that defendant was sworn by an officer duly authorized; the substance of his evidence; and the further allegation that the. same was false, and that defendant knew at the time that the same was false. State v. Blize-, 111 Mo. 471; Williams v. State, 68 Ala. 555; Roscoe’s Crim.…
1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.
At the September term, 1904, of the circuit court of Douglas county, Missouri, the prosecuting attorney of said county filed in said court the following information:
“In the circuit court of Douglas county, Missouri, a.t the September term, 1904.
“State of Missouri, vs. ‘ ‘ Charles W alker.
“Fred Stewart, prosecuting attorney within and for the county of Douglas and State of Missouri, upon his oath informs the court that heretofore, to-wit, at the county of Douglas and State of Missouri, at the March term of the circuit court of Douglas county, on the 2nd day of April, 1904, before the Hon.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Crawford v. SpencerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- State v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Tipton v. RennerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Walser v. WearSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- O'Malley v. Continental Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
- State v. BiedermannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
- State v. TimeusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911