State v. Timeus
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from St. Lonis Court of Criminal Correction. —Hon. Wilson A. Taylor, Judge. "While the constitutional questions arising in this case may not have appeared in the record proper to have been raised until on motion for a new trial, nevertheless the court must bear in mind that this cause was tried before a court without a jury, and a court not of record, and that plaintiff’s motion to discharge at the close of the' hearing, because of the unconstitutionality of the…
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Lonis Court of Criminal Correction. —Hon. Wilson A. Taylor, Judge. "While the constitutional questions arising in this case may not have appeared in the record proper to have been raised until on motion for a new trial, nevertheless the court must bear in mind that this cause was tried before a court without a jury, and a court not of record, and that plaintiff’s motion to discharge at the close of the' hearing, because of the unconstitutionality of the statute upon which the indictment was bottomed, was, of necessity, not of record, as well as tbe statement of tbe court that…
1Opinion of the CourtKennish, P. J.
The defendant was prosecuted in the Court of Criminal Correction of the city of St. Louis, upon an information charging a misdemeanor, to-wit, a violation of section 7801, Revised Statutes 1909, concerning employment agencies. A jury being waived, he was tried by the court, found guilty, and his punishment assessed a,t a fine of two hundred dollars.
After motions for new trial and in arrest were filed and overruled, judgment was pronounced, in ac*310cordan.ce with, the finding, and an appeal was granted to this court. For some cause which does not appear in the transcript, the appeal was certified…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. SeatonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- State v. CutberthSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- State v. BrannonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. TimeusMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911