Legal Opinion
Arnold v. Metlife Auto & Home Insurance Agency, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 12, 2019No. 5:19-cv-03920Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 MARIE A. ARNOLD, Case No. 19-cv-03920-VKD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING METLIFE AUTO 10 v. & HOME INSURANCE AGENCY, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS 11 METLIFE AUTO & HOME INSURANCE AMENDED COMPLAINT AGENCY, INC., et al., 12 Re: Dkt. No. 24 Defendants. 13 14 Defendant MetLife Auto & Home Insurance Agency, Inc. (“MAHIA”) moves to dismiss 15 all claims asserted against it by plaintiff Marie A. Arnold. Dkt. No. 24. The Court held a hearing 16 on the motion on November 12, 2019. Upon consideration of the moving…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Frizell Clegg v. Cult Awareness Network Cult Awareness Network, Los Angeles Chapter Cynthia Kisser Priscilla CoatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.