Legal Opinion

Boney v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1979No. 13167PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Associate Judge:

Appellant contends that the evidence adduced at his trial was insufficient to support his conviction for perjury and hence that the trial judge erred in failing to grant a motion for a judgment of acquittal. We affirm.

I

Looking at the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, Creek v. United States, D.C.App., 324 A.2d 688, 689 (1974), the record reflects the following: At approximately 11:25 p. m. on May 25, 1976, Officer Franklin George of the Metropolitan Police Department was driving his cruiser east on D Street, S.E. He heard a gunshot and saw a flash…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  2. Watts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Weiler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Hammer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. United States v. Martin SweigCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SanchezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. In Re WhiteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Jenkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Murphy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API