Legal Opinion

Murphy v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 8, 1996No. 94-CF-989PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Associate Judge:

Appellant was convicted of assault, carrying a pistol without a license, and perjury. His convictions were based on an incident that involved the shooting of Pemell Gibson, and on appellant’s testimony to the grand jury that was investigating the incident. Appellant argues that the trial court erred in permitting the jurors at his trial to take notes and to use them in their deliberations. We follow binding precedent establishing that trial courts in this jurisdiction have discretion to permit jurors to take and use notes at criminal trials, and hold that the trial…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Hammer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Payne v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Settles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Scales v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Gaffney v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Darius Brown and Jamal Shepherd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. United States v. HogueCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API