Legal Opinion

Schaefer v. Bork

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 20, 1987No. C3-87-503PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

In this action for the dissolution and an accounting of a partnership, appellant Joseph Schaefer questions the trial court’s determination of his partnership interest. Schaefer further alleges error in the court’s disallowance of pre-judgment interest. Respondent Charles Bork challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the jury’s finding that a partnership existed, alleges that any partnership agreement is void under the statute of frauds, and asserts error in evidentiary rulings and jury instructions. We affirm on all substantive issues, but reverse the court’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Hammel v. FeighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Roaderick v. Lull Engineering Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Lunning v. Land O'LakesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Maras v. StilinovichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCrea & Co. Auctioneers, Inc. v. Dwyer Auto BodyColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Maus v. GalicCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  3. In re HarstadDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API