Legal Opinion

Sanborn Manufacturing Co. v. Currie

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 25, 1993No. C1-93-301PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant Charles Currie challenges the trial court's temporary injunction prohibiting him from breaching a noncompetition agreement. Appellant argues that respondent Sanborn Manufacturing Company failed to show irreparable harm and a likelihood of success on the merits, and thus it was not entitled to a temporary injunction. We agree that Sanborn failed to show any likelihood of success on the merits and we reverse.

FACTS

Appellant Charles Currie worked as a marketing manager for respondent San-born Manufacturing Company for more than four years. Before working for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. Davies & Davies Agency, Inc. v. DaviesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. National Recruiters, Inc. v. CashmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Pickerign v. Pasco Marketing, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Midwest Sign & Screen Printing Supply Co. v. Robert Dalpe & Laird Plastics, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2019
  2. Johnson v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
  3. Midwest Sports Marketing, Inc. v. Hillerich & Bradsby of Canada, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Century Business Services, Inc. v. BartonOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. Minnesota Twins PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API