Sanborn Manufacturing Co. v. Currie
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant Charles Currie challenges the trial court's temporary injunction prohibiting him from breaching a noncompetition agreement. Appellant argues that respondent Sanborn Manufacturing Company failed to show irreparable harm and a likelihood of success on the merits, and thus it was not entitled to a temporary injunction. We agree that Sanborn failed to show any likelihood of success on the merits and we reverse.
FACTS
Appellant Charles Currie worked as a marketing manager for respondent San-born Manufacturing Company for more than four years. Before working for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Davies & Davies Agency, Inc. v. DaviesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- National Recruiters, Inc. v. CashmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Pickerign v. Pasco Marketing, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
3Cited by19 opinions
- Midwest Sign & Screen Printing Supply Co. v. Robert Dalpe & Laird Plastics, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2019
- Johnson v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- Midwest Sports Marketing, Inc. v. Hillerich & Bradsby of Canada, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Century Business Services, Inc. v. BartonOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. Minnesota Twins PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.