Legal Opinion
United States v. Carmen Denise Heredia
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 30, 2007No. 19-15611PublishedCited by 136 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge KOZINSKI; Concurrence by Judge KLIENFELD; Dissent by Judge GRABER.
*917ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
Footnote 4 of the opinion in this case, filed April 2, 2007, is amended to read as follows:
As our cases have recognized, deliberate ignorance, otherwise known as willful blindness, is categorically different from negligence or recklessness. See, e.g., United States v. Fulbright, 105 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.1997); United States v. Sanchez-Robles, 927 F.2d 1070, 1073 (9th Cir.1991). A willfully blind defendant is one who took deliberate actions to avoid…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Miller v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Jones v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by136 opinions
- Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Maria Escriba v. Foster Poultry Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Maureen Riccio v. Sentry Credit IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- State v. TeagleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.