Dean v. Lammers
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Sheboygam, County. The facts sufficiently appear from the opinion. To the point that the facts showed a sale, counsel for the appellant cited Riohcvrdson v. Obnstead, 14 Ill. 213; Benjamin on Sales, secs. 81, 328; Bigler v. Hall, 54 N. Y. 107; Bahilly v. Wilson, 3 Dill. 420; Lonergan v. Stewart, 55 Ill. 44; Johnston v. Browne, 87 Iowa, 200; For-ton v. Wood/ruff, 2 N. Y. 155; Hilliard on Sales, 17; MoOon-nellv. Hughes, 29 Wis. 537.
1Opinion of the CourtOetox, J.
The complaint states substantially the following facts: In the month of February, 1876, one Ellen-backer sold to the defendant about 337 bushels of wheat; one Ternes, about 87 bushels; and one Puetz, about 170 bushels,— and delivered the same to the defendant into his warehouse at Cedar Grove, at a price to be fixed by Ellen-backer, Ternes, and Puetz, respectively, at any time within the following three months, which said wheat, at the time of such sale and delivery, was worth in that market $1.10 per bushel, for which, in the aggregate, judgment is demanded. In about two months thereafter…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ledyard v. HibbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Seymour v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1821
- Erwin v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
- Irons v. KentnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wilke v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932