Legal Opinion

Wilke v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

Defendant’s first contention is that there is no evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant.*621This contention requires a consideration in some detail of the facts.

Upon the road where the accident occurred defendant maintains a double set of tracks, and was engaged in repairing these tracks. As an incident to this repair the workmen, at the time of the accident, were in the act of moving a crossover switch. This crossover switch was sixty-five or seventy feet long and weighed about six tons. It consisted of ordinary street-car rails and was so designed that it could be imposed upon the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lauson v. Town of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Shawano County v. Froemming Bros.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Riha v. PelnarWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Robinson v. City of OcontoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Barlass v. KargusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ValliereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Estate of JavornikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Morley v. City of ReedsburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Bittner v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API