Legal Opinion

State v. Patterson

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 9, 2005PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDana, J.

[¶ 1] The State of Maine appeals from a judgment entered in the District Court (Bangor, Russell, J.) granting Joshua Patterson’s motion to suppress evidence obtained after a University of Maine police officer approached his parked vehicle. The State argues that Patterson was not seized within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment, and that the evidence should have been admitted in the State’s prosecution of Patterson for OUI (Class D), pursuant to 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2411(1) (1996), 1 and operating after suspension (Class E), pursuant to 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2412-A(1), (3) (1996). 2 Because the record…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. DraytonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Ebarb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Holland v. SebunyaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. HutchinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  2. State v. NaultSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  3. County of Grant v. Daniel A. VogtWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State of Maine v. Dubois Livestock, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  5. State v. GrossCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API