Hutchinson v. Philadelphia & G. S. S. Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
In Equity. Action by S. E. Hutchinson against the Philadelphia & Gulf Steamship Company. On petition of Samuel S. Bloom for leave to intervene.
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, District Judge.
Upon bill filed January 8, 1913, by S. E. Hutchinson, a creditor, and answer admitting the allegations of the bill, a receiver was appointed on the same day to take charge of and preserve the property of the defendant and continue the operation of its steamship line. Upon various petitions of the receiver, orders shown to be necessary for preservation of assets of the company and continuance of the business of the company as a going concern were regularly granted at various times, and, upon petition of April 24, 1913, setting forth the danger of loss to the company…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Allis-Chalmers Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1912
- Forbes v. Memphis, E. P. & P. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Texas · 1872
- Lombard Inv. Co. v. Seaboard Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Alabama · 1896
- Marks v. Merrill Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
- Land Title & Trust Co. v. Asphalt Co. of AmericaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. California Coöperative CanneriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Monticello Building Corp. v. Monticello Investment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- Storetrax.com, Inc. v. GurlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Equitable Trust Co. v. Denver & R. G. R.District Court, D. Colorado · 1920
- Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. Chicago Rys. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.