Legal Opinion
Lombard Inv. Co. v. Seaboard Manuf'g Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Alabama
Decided March 28, 1896No. 198PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TOULMIN, District Judge.
This cause came on to be heard, in the matter of the petition of intervention of the People’s Bank on motion to vacate the order allowing- the intervention, and to strike out the petition on various grounds set out in the motion.
Among other grounds it is contended that the motion should he granted because the petition for leave to intervene was presented and granted without notice to the complainants in the cause, or, in other words, because the hearing of the petition was ex parte. There is no fixed or general rule in this court that requires notice of a petition or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Smith v. GaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Fidelity Trust & Safety Vault Co. v. Mobile St. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Alabama · 1893
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. California Coöperative CanneriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- McClellan v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
- Coffman v. Spokane Chronicle Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- Weatherby v. Kent Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.